Komari-chan watches her team depart on their mission.
My hopes are riding on you. Please succeed.
She turns around, facing the remaining members
Now then, we have some time on our hands and a few things to clear up. I will try not to get mad.
Kengo-kun(@Karifean), even if you are offended by being suspected, or trying to act like it, your tone is still too sharp and there’s a lot of ridicule in your speech. I’m fine as long as you keep it logical, but someone who himself admitted that he said - and thus done - so little is in no position to look down on my efforts.
Kengo-kun, if you are going to call my reasons shallow, please don’t do so after insisting that it’s “borderline impossible” for members of the same team with the same goal to vote unanimously at the safest time to do so and end up being the 4 out of 5 members who had approved of a team with one of their members on it.
As if that wasn’t enough, you take it a step further and insist that there MUST therefore have been a disagreement among the spies concerning the first team. Mio-chan had chosen Haru-chan and me for that mission.
The strangest part of it would be that Mio-chan ended up rejecting her own team.
I have thought about it and tried out various combinations and scenarios while imagining that 1. Mio-chan, whom you have suspicious about, is a spy and 2. a misunderstanding did occur, but none of them make sense to me. If you have a particular one in mind, spell it out.
In fact, if Mio-chan is a suspect, then so are you. Everyone probably forgot it, but back then, Mio-chan said~
She rumnages through her pile of sketches and pulls out one that depicts a Mio-looking chick below a thought bubble. Inside the bubble, there are four chicks representing Komari-chan, Mio-chan(again), Haru-chan and Kengo-kun. Threre’s a green circle around Kengo-kun and a red X on Komari-chan.
I actually have reasons not to distrust Mio-chan precisely because I suspect Haru-chan.
- Volunteering for missions makes a lot more sense for spies than it does for Little Busters.
- Why would a spy volunteer at a particular point in time? Because the current leader is a Little Buster.
Phew. Takes a sip from a tea bottle
There’s more I could say on this particular topic, but I’m getting sidetracked from what I initially wanted to say: As I stated previously, I’m basing a big part of my conclusion on the results of the very first voting. It also acted as a safety net while I was choosing the members for my team. While I do suspect you for volunteering for missions and mostly because Masato-kun went from picking a fight with you like he normally does to praising you in a very short amount of time and proceeded to nominate you for missions later on, it’s also true that my suspicion of you is the weakest among those four. But it doesn’t matter either way, because according to the results of the first voting, if you’re not a spy, then Rin-chan is. As long as I made sure not to pick either of the five of you for the team, I would be fine. If any of the teammates I chose had refused, I would’ve been forced to take greater risks and either pick Rin-chan after all or get on the team myself and face rejection from several people. But between Rin-chan and you, you are the more suspicious one to me.
Kengo-kun, you’re complaining about how I distrust Haru-chan “time and time again”. This is a very weird way of thinking and I’ll adress it because you may not be the only one mistaken here. What do you think suspicion is? A fad? Recreation? Do you expect me to suspect people just for the fun of it and then drop it after a while? This is not how it works. Suspicion persists until it’s at least partially cleared. I had two reasons to suspect Haru-chan and no reasons not to. Sure, it’s not based on solid proof (that’s why it’s called suspicion), but that doesn’t make my reasons decay over time. So why would I just up and quit halfway through? From my standpoint, that would be the stranger, and the more suspicious thing to do.
Breathes heavily, empties the bottle and puts it away
Thus, my conclusion is perfectly logical and consistent. If it turns out wrong, it would be because the assumptions I’m basing it on are wrong. In other words…
Looks at Masato
If the person in the middle of it all has been acting irrationally throughout more than four votings and didn’t fix it until it was too late, just as he’s claiming. Logic is weak to irrational behavior, after all.